Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603514 --- Comment #20 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-19 22:53:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > My goal with libmodman and F-13 is to get libmodman working in F-14 with > libproxy >= 0.4.4, then I will backport to F-13 and remove the conflicts. That > is why I applied for a libmodman F-13 branch. > It make sense, I can't find any better solution right now :) > So the only outstanding issue I can see is the libmodman-devel directory > ownership issue. I believe this can be resolved by having libmodman-devel > require cmake (which owns the directory). If this is not appropriate, please > suggest an alternative option. Requires cmake if building libproxy 0.4.4 need this file or simply remove this file after make install. For pkgconfig, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Pkgconfig_Files, but requires pkgconfig is also Okay, it's the same. Incluing documentions in -devel is not mandatory, some rpmlint warnings can be ignored, e.g. W: spelling-error, W: no-documentation. You don't need to add LICENSE file to all subpackages, -devel subpackage should only contain docs which are related to development e.g. apidocs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review