[Bug 603846] Review Request: libpeas - Plug-ins implementation convenience library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603846

--- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen <mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-17 23:11:59 EDT ---
package name: OK
spec file name: OK
packaging guidelines: 
 - the initial rm in %install is no longer required
 - %clean is also no longer needed
 - since you are installing icons in hicolor, you should update the hicolor
   icon cache in %posttrans/%postun
license: OK
license file: needs to be included
license field: OK
spec language: OK
spec readable: OK
upstream sources: OK
buildable: OK
ExcludeArch: OK
BuildRequires: OK
locale handling: OK
ldconfig: OK
system libraries: OK
relocatable: OK
directory ownership:
 - must own %(_libdir}/libpeas-1.0 and %{_libdir}/libpeas-1.0/loaders
 - must either own %{_libdir}/girepository-1.0 or require gobject-introspection
 - same for %{_datadir}/gir-1.0
duplicate files: OK
file permissions: OK
macro use: OK
permissible content: OK
large docs: OK
%doc content: OK
header files: OK
static libs: OK
shared libs: OK
devel deps: OK
libtool archives: OK
GUI apps: OK
file ownership: OK
utf8 filenames: OK

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]