Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600914 --- Comment #5 from Richard Fearn <richardfearn@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-16 16:56:37 EDT --- > Close to done. Please also write 'GPLv2 only' into the License tag. The correct short name is "GPLv2", according to: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses Additionally rpmlint doesn't like "GPLv2 only": txt2regex.src: W: invalid-license GPLv2 only > It would be enought for me, to see a commit on an upstream repository or to > have another 'proof' for the license confirmation. I'm not sure there is a repository - just the tgz download. > I just stepped into this: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Clarification Thanks for the link - I wasn't aware of that page. > It would be the easiest, if upstream would update all it's webpages and adds > headers to a new release... > If you want to go fast, please add the email source and mark as %doc as > described at the link from above. I've asked Aurélio (txt2regex author) whether he is willing to make a new release that clarifies the licence. If not, I'll add the email I got from him. I'll upload a new spec/SRPM soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review