Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593841 Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |leigh123linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxx | |m --- Comment #38 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-15 16:43:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > Is it acceptable to merge wicd-common into wicd package until rpm allow noarch > package to have arch specfic subpackages? AFAIK this is a limitation of the buildsys but not of rpm itself. > Wicd is designed as a non-multiarch > package, making it noarch won't save space for both repos and end users > currently. I know, hence my suggestion: SRPM is "wicd" and builds into - wicd-pm-utils (base-package, arch) - wicd-common (noarch, the name wicd-common was chosen to indicate it is not standalone and because it must not be "wicd" to not become the base-package) - wicd-curses (noarch) - wicd-gtk (noarch) - wicd-gtk will get a "Provides: %{name} = %{version}" so that "yum install wicd" works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review