Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603521 --- Comment #8 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-14 14:49:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > If this package were to be titled something other than pynetsnmp, I would think > it would be python-netsnmp (stripping off the 'py'). The naming guideline for python modules is ambiguous, so the name of py* python modules in fedora are a bit inconsistency. Currently both pynetsnmp and python-pynetsnmp is accetptable, this won't be an issue until FPC decides to modify the naming guideline. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 Packages of python modules should take into account the upstream name of the python module. This makes a package name format of python-$NAME. When in doubt, use the name of the module that you type to import it in a script. There is an exception to this rule. If the upstream source has "py" (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package. So, for example, pygtk is acceptable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review