Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603521 --- Comment #4 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-14 13:58:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I disagree. python-py* is redundant. The packaging guidelines also state: > "If the upstream source has "py" (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name > for the package." > Users can run an rpm -ql to see what the namespace of the package is after the > fact. I know what naming guideline states, I don't intend to oppose this review request. actually the naming of python modules in fedora is a bit inconsistency. yum list python-py\* , you'll find it also exists many packages. Since most py* modules in pypi don't include py in their namespace, excluding python in package name is reasonable under most circumstance, things became much worse when you look at *py or *python packages in fedora. I'll suggest python-SIG to state more clearly on python modules naming scheme. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review