[Bug 600243] Review Request: libjpeg-turbo - MMX/SSE accelerated libjpeg

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243

--- Comment #25 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-14 06:51:39 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> (In reply to comment #18)
> > Hi Adam,
> > Add -static subpackage and more documents to mainpackage and -devel subpackage,
> > I'll start to review this package.
> 
> As I wrote in the comment #23 I don't think the -static package is needed now.
> 
> I included the "example.c" documentation file in the devel subpackage and
> extended description a little, it should be sufficient.
> 
> New spec + SRPM:
> http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo.spec
> http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-0.0.93-6.fc14.src.rpm    

How about to ask this on -devel? I found that many core libraries in fedora
provides static libs, e.g. glibc openssl zlib libpng. 

If we don't provide -static subpackage, we need to obsolete it in the main
package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]