Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #23 from Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-14 06:19:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Well, nonetheless, you *are* going to get push-back if you remove the static > library. I know because it was tried once already, and not that long ago. See > bug #186060, bug #215537. Fedora is used for other things than just building > itself. In my opinion it's long time since F7 (libjpeg-turbo will hit F14) so we can "retest" if someone still needs the static libjpeg. I would rather see no static libjpeg.a for now. It might be easily added in the future if someone requests it, libjpeg-turbo project uses libtool so I will drop the "--disable-static" configure flag in the specfile and add -static subpackage, it's pretty simple. If we package -static libjpeg now we won't be able to figure time when we can say "noone uses the static libjpeg.a". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review