Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Tracker - An object database, tag/metadata database, search tool and indexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214025 ------- Additional Comments From dakingun@xxxxxxxxx 2006-11-04 19:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=140370) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=140370&action=view) [edit] > Diff to tracker.spec > > Weird, the package I downloaded has libexif-devel, libgsf-devel etc. as > BuildRequires. pango-devel is not required as it's pulled in by > gnome-desktop-devel. > > Missing BuildRequires: > dbus-devel dbus-glib-devel gnome-utils-devel libpng-devel openssl-devel > Most of these are already pulled in by other dependencies. But why is gnome-utils-devel and openssl-devel needed, I can't find anything in the configure log that that suggest they are > Description has some misspelled words, and summary should not end in '.'; also, Gone thru and corrected a bunch (I had copied it directly from the README). > since libraries are included you need to call ldconfig on %post and %postun > Done. > Do we want to split the libraries into separate packages? > > Actually, Aurelien, you can take over the review if you want. I'm less familiar > with autostarting. > I've also commented the build fails with the smp flags. I'll work on the autostarting stuff tomorrow. Thanks for reviewing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review