Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598688 Randall Berry <randyn3lrx@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |randyn3lrx@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #2 from Randall Berry <randyn3lrx@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-11 22:54:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > archivemount.c has "This program can be distributed under the terms of the GNU > GPL" for its license. According to the GPL license included at COPYING, if no > version of the GPL is specified it can be licensed under any version. Under the > Fedora project, this short name for this license should be 'GPL+' > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Good_Licenses. This program is licensed under LGPLv2+ according to the COPYING file. > rpmlint > ------- > [mmckinst@fedora13 SRPMS]$ rpmlint archivemount-0.6.0-1.fc13.src.rpm > archivemount.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) filesystem -> file system, > file-system, falsest > archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarchive -> lib > archive, lib-archive, archive > archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gz -> Hz, G, Z > archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US bz -> biz, NZ, bx > archivemount.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US filesystem -> file > system, file-system, falsest > archivemount.src: W: invalid-license GPL > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. > [mmckinst@fedora13 SRPMS]$ Typically warnings like this can be ignored as they are intentionally spelled this way. Spelling them any other way would not make sense in the description. rpmlint should also be run on ALL packages including the spec. Running rpmlint on all files yields 3 warnings and 1 error. archivemount.i686: W: invalid-license GPL archivemount.src: W: invalid-license GPL archivemount-debuginfo.i686: W: invalid-license GPL archivemount-debuginfo.i686: E: debuginfo-without-sources Fix the first 3 warnings by changing the license in the spec to LGPLv2+ and rebuilding the srpm. I'm not sure how to fix the error as I did not dig too deep. I am not a sponsor I just wanted to point out a few things I noticed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review