Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600243 --- Comment #7 from Adam Tkac <atkac@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-10 05:02:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > For packages that are not usually pulled in by using the package name as the > dependency such as library only packages (which are pulled in through library > soname depenencies), there's usually no need to add the Provides. Note however > that the -devel subpackages of lib packages are pulled in as build dependencies > using the package name, so adding the Provides is often appropriate there. > > So for libjpeg-turbo and libjpeg-turbo-tools provides are not needed. Upgrade > path is not related to provides at all. Your analysis seems valid for me, I modified the obsoletes/provides as you suggested. New spec + SRPM: http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo.spec http://atkac.fedorapeople.org/libjpeg-turbo/libjpeg-turbo-0.0.93-3.fc14.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review