Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 --- Comment #43 from Jaroslav Škarvada <jskarvad@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-09 04:02:17 EDT --- I patched sendmail to build with libdd-5, rebuilt it with libdb-5 and switched to /etc/sasl2 config dir. The proposed changes are in CVS - sendmail-8.14.4-6.fc14. The sasl tries /usr/lib64/sasl2 and /etc/sasl2 config dirs in sequence and the first has higher priority. I add test for config in /usr/lib64/sasl2. If there exists config I move it to /etc/sasl2 replacing whatever is there (/etc/sasl2 has lower priority thus it wasn't used before and this approach shouldn't be a problem). I also fix timestamps. The config did not change between releases thus if not modified by user, the rpm verify should pass after upgrade. I used post section for this change, because if used in pre section, the old config was always replaced by file from the package (even with noreplace). Any comments/improvements are welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review