[Bug 591365] Review Request: libexplain - Library functions to explain system call errors

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591365

Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |martin.gieseking@xxxxxx

--- Comment #1 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-06-04 03:56:21 EDT ---
Hi Eric,

some quick comments:

- unlike your comment in the spec file, the regular SF download URL works, so
you should change Source0 to
https://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

- The intended license seems to be LGPLv3+. However the sources in
libexplain/iocontrol refer to GPL3+. That would result in GPL3+. You should ask
upstream if this is intentional or a mistake. In the latter case the comment
headers should be fixed.

- the package fails to build in mock and koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2229164

This is because there are some includes missing, e.g. 
  in libexplain/buffer/ifreq_data/hwtstamp_config.c:
  #include <libexplain/parse_bits.h>

  in libexplain/iocontrol/siocshwtstamp.c:
  #include <libexplain/path_is_efault.h>

I didn't try to find all. There are some more includes missing.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]