[Bug 598902] Review Request: PXZ - Parallel LZMA compressor compatible with XZ

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598902

Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@xxxxxx> 2010-06-03 14:49:18 EDT ---
This is a package review, not a merge review ;)


$ rpmlint pxz-*
pxz.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.999.9-0.1.20100603.beta
['4.999.9-0.1.beta.20100603git.fc13', '4.999.9-0.1.beta.20100603git']
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

so the change log EVR entries should be of the style
 4.999.9-0.1.beta.20100603git
not
 4.999.9-0.1.20100603.beta


- I abhor wildcards where they are not needed. Please change
 %{_mandir}/man1/*.1*
to
 %{_mandir}/man1/pxz.1*

- Please change URL to
 http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/pxz
as that's a *lot* easier to paste from the spec file.


Otherwise, my earlier comments seem to have been taken into account. One final
comment: now the compilation does not use the "-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE" flags. Are these not necessary on Fedora?


The final changes are cosmetic, so you can consider this package

APPROVED

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]