Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=597978 --- Comment #5 from huwang <huwang@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-06-01 23:38:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Review: > > FIXIT: rpmlint must be run on every package. Output: > > maven-ant-plugin.noarch: W: self-obsoletion maven2-plugin-ant <= 0:2.0.8 > obsoletes maven2-plugin-ant = 2.3-1.fc13 > > It is obsoleting with Epoch but providing without Epoch. > To fix it: > Provides: maven2-plugin-ant = %{version}-%{release} should become > Provides: maven2-plugin-ant = 0:%{version}-%{release} Fixed. As Stanislav said epoch should be 1(see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598058), for now I'm not sure about it. > > maven-ant-plugin.noarch: W: no-documentation > maven-ant-plugin.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/maven/fragments/maven-ant-plugin > > False positives. > > OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . > OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. > OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . > OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines . > OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in > its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc. > OK: The spec file must be written in American English. > OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. > OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. > OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at > least one primary architecture. > OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that > are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of > those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries. > OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a > directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that > directory. > OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's > %files listings. > OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. > OK: Each package must consistently use macros. > OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. > OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. > OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of > the application. > OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. > > Other than the provides everything else looks good. Spec URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_ant_plugin/maven-ant-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://huwang.fedorapeople.org/packages/maven_ant_plugin/maven-ant-plugin-2.3-2.src.rpm scratch built in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2224086 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review