Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=593353 --- Comment #2 from Dan Horák <dan@xxxxxxxx> 2010-06-01 09:55:00 EDT --- I've checked the latest package (please post URLs of the updated srpm too) and there are 2 minor issues - from rpmlint: pyliblzma.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.5.3-1 ['0.5.3-2.fc14', '0.5.3-2'] => I think it's an omission pyliblzma.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/lzma.so 0775 => AFAIK caused by setuptools, chmod will fix it and one more serious - licensing - the only file with a license header is setup.py (clear LGPLv3+), but the license of the module is not so clear, the only reference is about LGPLv3 (in setup.py and PKG-INFO) => I would say the license of the binary package is LGPLv3. But the source files contains no copyright or license header and this is also not optimal. Please suggest the author to add this information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review