Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596659 Daiki Ueno <dueno@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |dueno@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |dueno@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Daiki Ueno <dueno@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-28 02:53:59 EDT --- Mostly ok. How about including FONTLOG to doc? Cosmetic things: - the "Version" is 003.000 (which came from the font, right?), but the upstream uses simpler naming for the archive: ofl-goudy-3.0.zip. I think we could use 3.0. - rpmlint spews a couple of warnings (harmless, I think): ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://sortsmill.googlecode.com/files/ofl-goudy-3.0.zip HTTP Error 404: Not Found ofl-sorts-mill-goudy-fonts.src: W: uncompressed-zip ofl-goudy-3.0.zip I have no idea how to workaround them :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review