Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542715 --- Comment #24 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez <nushio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-27 11:11:00 EDT --- Hey Kalev, I've been providing upstream with their current RPMs based on an older snapshot of the rabbitvcs spec (In fact, I've been uploading them to the downloads list) I don't think it requires provides/obsoletes, as a simple version check would make this package newer than the other one, and replace it properly. I uploaded a newer spec/srpm, making rabbitvcs-cli noarch. The rest can't be noarch though. I removed the unresolved dependency for rabbitvcs. It resolved here because I wasn't properly removing and installing the rpms. I'll get a VM to properly test the RPMs on a clean install. SPEC: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs.spec SRPM: http://nushio.fedorapeople.org/rabbitvcs/rabbitvcs-0.13.1-2.fc13.src.rpm Thanks a lot for your time and observations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review