Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #13 from Martin Gieseking <martin.gieseking@xxxxxx> 2010-05-25 09:00:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > The License should be LGPLv2+, license field is for binary not for source. Incorrect. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Combined_Dual_and_Multiple_Licensing_Scenario The license of the file is "compiled" into the library and thus part of the binary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review