Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594943 --- Comment #7 from Robin Norwood <robin.norwood@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-24 12:56:29 EDT --- Hi Martin, The reason I'm packaging libnoise in the first place is that the new version of MathMap (1.3.5) requires it. The upstream version of MathMap ships with a tarball of libnoise, patches it, builds it, and links against it statically. The QUALITY_BESTCASE patch is from MathMap. I can check to see if MathMap has submitted the patch upstream or not...otherwise, I'm not really sure how to proceed if libnoise upstream is not interested in the patch...none of the options seem very appealing. Any suggestions? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review