Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594481 --- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx> 2010-05-24 05:02:20 EDT --- Well, firstly -- are we sure that a package review request is exactly the best place to discuss this? (In reply to comment #10) > Regarding the trilead release: yes, looking back it was a bad idea to rename > the library (and the contained namespaces). It only lead to confusion. Lightly put -- renaming namespace is not the best idea, doing it twice after most users moved to the new namespace deliberately breaking compatibility is downright stupid. > Regarding Orion: I do not like it, they never contacted me or Trilead, their > additions are simple and think they do not give proper credit. I believe noone contained either trilead or ganymed because both parties demonstrated their uninterest in the code base. I have not learned about regained interest in ganymed until after we've got involved in orion-ssh2 to get the project back to life. It's fine that you don't like our efforts, but you're to blame for the mess and all the private forks of ssh2, not us. I find it unfair that you accuse us of not giving a proper credit. We've taken the trilead code base as it was; basically only change we did was changing the project name in README, which was because Trilead is a trade mark and to avoid confusion. Moreover, we've carefully preserved every single bit of authorship information about the code we pulled in from third parties in GIT and documented it in license file. Could we do more? > Of course, just > my opinion. It matters here, I guess. > I will happily add any feature to the ganymed-ssh2 code base (including those > fixes that went into orion) to ease your packaging, but you have to decide > which one you will use. Well, I strongly prefer the idea of having just a single code base if possible. Therefore, if newly respawned ganymed-ssh2 proves viable (at the very least by having IntelliJ IDEA, Hudson and DSSH switched to it), I'm happily going to loose interest in orion-ssh2 and will withdraw this review request: PS: If you're going to pull from us, please do so from GIT, where commit metadata is preserved, unlike from SVN: https://sourceforge.net/scm/?type=git&group_id=273755 Thank you in advance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review