Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beryl-core - Beryl OpenGL window and compositing manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209259 ------- Additional Comments From jwilson@xxxxxxxxxx 2006-11-01 00:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #8) > I have just tested the packages on a fresh installation. > All work well after installing libXcomposite manually (it's requiere). > > libXcomposite-devel and libXdamage-devel are requieres at build time for > beryl-core, beryl-plugins and beryl-settings. > > I also noticed that libwnck-devel is requiere by emerald. > > In any event, these missing build requieres will be easily found by mock when > the packages are review. As it happens, I was just working on this very thing earlier today, and had already pushed out new builds of most components. Most of the packages were missing BR on libtool and gettext-devel as well. Didn't catch the libwnck-devel BR on emerald though, so I went back through clean mock builds on every package. I just finished building all the latest versions of the packages a bit ago, and all appear to have appropriate BuildRequires in place now. Oh, I've also put together binaries for x86_64, i386 and ppc, for anyone that wants to play with them (along with a yum repo file, so folks can yum upgrade as new builds get pushed). http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/beryl.repo Re: comment #7, yeah, those look like they're built from my specs, heh. The W: about no- documentation is ignorable (similar warning on emerald-devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review