Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592670 --- Comment #18 from Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-19 10:13:20 EDT --- Ralf, (In reply to comment #17) > If, for some reasons, they need to be dlopen'ed, then the "versioned libraries" > libraries need to be dlopen'ed, not the unversioned libraries. > > I.e. dlopening libopenssl.so is wrong. > It should be libopenssl.so.<something> => This package needs to be patched. > > BTW: I just noticed, in mongoose, the same consideration applies to > libcrypto.so.*. I think it would be a good approach apply a patch to fix that two #defines SSL_LIB and CRYPTO_LIB in mongoose.c, wouldn't it? That way we fix this issue with dlopen'ed non-versioned libraries without asking for great modifications on the whole project. I can ask upstream for a patch, or I can provide that patch from myself. If so, it will remain me one more question: Just after patching mongoose.c to fix the SSL requisites it would be advisable to include openssl as a req to mongoose rpm installation, wouldn't be? Once again, thanks for your attention Regards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review