Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578480 --- Comment #6 from Matej Cepl <mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-19 03:30:09 EDT --- We have progress, 0.2 with some patches now builds on EPEL-5 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2196133 (we need ExcludeArch: ppc though) Also upgraded to 0.2 and fixed some nits. However, rpmlint is very unhappy about us (omitting some spelling nonsenses): johanka:build$ rpmlint -i RPMS/x86_64/spectrum-* spectrum.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/spectrum/spectrum.cfg 0640L The file can't be read by everybody. If this is expected (for security reasons), contact your rpmlint distributor to get it added to the list of exceptions for your distro (or add it to your local configuration if you installed rpmlint from the source tarball). spectrum.x86_64: W: missing-lsb-keyword Default-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/spectrum The package contains an init script that does not contain one of the LSB init script comment block convention keywords that are recommendable for all init scripts. If there is nothing to add to a keyword's value, include the keyword in the script with an empty value. Note that as of version 3.2, the LSB specification does not mandate presence of any keywords. spectrum.x86_64: E: subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/spectrum While your daemon is running, you have to put a lock file in /var/lock/subsys/. To see an example, look at this directory on your machine and examine the corresponding init scripts. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings. johanka:build$ ------------------------------------------ The first one is probably harmless, but I am not sure about the remaining ones. I was looking at your init.d script and wasn't sure how is it supposed to work .... should it be possible to run spectrum multiple times? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review