[Bug 592670] Review Request: mongoose - An easy-to-use self-sufficient web server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592670

--- Comment #2 from Rafael Aquini <aquini@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-17 10:15:32 EDT ---
Spec URL: http://aquini.tchesoft.com/RPMS/mongoose/mongoose.spec
SRPM URL: http://aquini.tchesoft.com/RPMS/mongoose/mongoose-2.8-2.fc12.src.rpm

MD5:
fa58e9038709d389b2fc7c6cffc9c068  mongoose-2.8-2.fc12.src.rpm
3ffb7344a8f8cb8056cfa2c8e220649c  mongoose.spec


Chen,
Thanks for reviewing the spec.

I did make some of the modifications you suggested, as follows:
[2] -devel package was stripped off the spec file;
[3] The misusing of %doc was fixed;
[4] Group changed to Applications/System -- IMHO, I do not think it could fit
in anyone else in System Environment class;
[5] Now the man page compression is done by rpmbuild itself.

Unfortunately, there was some suggestions of yours I could not deliver as
promptly as you wish: 
[1] I do not see a real necessity to ship a SysV initscrip, since mongoose is a
regular user tool not intended to work as a daemon. The purpose of mongoose is
to give flexibility to an ordinary user (not administrator) when he/she needs
to set up quickly an web server to share files in a specific directory, or just
do some tests. Please, let me know if you observation [1] is a real blocker to
this package. 

[6] As you may notice, there is no install section on Makefile delivered by
upstream, so I have the real need of being using %{__install} macros. IMHO, it 
would be preferable using this macros than the commands itself, wouldn' be?
Please, let me know if you observation [6] is also a real blocker to this
package.  

Once again, thanks a lot for your attention on this matter.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]