Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=592137 Aditya Patawari <adimania@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adimania@xxxxxxxxx --- Comment #6 from Aditya Patawari <adimania@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-17 07:14:54 EDT --- Informal Review rpmlint output: koffice-kivio.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) flowcharting -> flow charting, flow-charting, flowchart koffice-kivio.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US flowcharting -> flow charting, flow-charting, flowchart Error checking signature of ../../Downloads/koffice-kivio-1.6.3-31.trinity.20100511svn.fc13.src.rpm: ../../Downloads/koffice-kivio-1.6.3-31.trinity.20100511svn.fc13.src.rpm: (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS:GPG#1634f842) koffice-kivio.src: W: invalid-url Source1: kivio-translations-20100511.tar.bz2 koffice-kivio.src: W: invalid-url Source0: koffice-trinity-20100511.tar.bz2 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. + Package meets naming and packaging guidelines + Spec file matches base package name. + Spec has consistant macro usage. + Meets Packaging Guidelines. + License + License field in spec matches + License file included in package + Spec in American English + Spec is legible. + BuildRequires correct + defattr present and correct + %doc is fine + BuildRoot is correct {_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) + desktop files are properly validated. + Package is code and has permissible content. + Package owns all the directories it creates. - md5sum not verified as the source was tarred manually from the svn snapshot - There is no step-by-step guide on how to get the source tarball. The package looks fine, has to reviewed by a packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review