[Bug 225764] Merge Review: fonts-ISO8859-2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225764

Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #18 from Akira TAGOH <tagoh@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-17 04:15:26 EDT ---
Review results:
+ rpmlint result:
  ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dpi -> dip,
pi, dpt
  ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dpi ->
dip, pi, dpt
  ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-url-tag
  ISO8859-2-100dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
  ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) dpi -> dip,
pi, dpt
  ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dpi ->
dip, pi, dpt
  ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-url-tag
  ISO8859-2-75dpi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
  ISO8859-2-fonts.src: W: no-url-tag
  ISO8859-2-fonts.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ISO8859-2-bdf.tar.gz
  ISO8859-2-fonts-common.noarch: W: no-url-tag
  ISO8859-2-misc-fonts.noarch: W: no-url-tag
  ISO8859-2-misc-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation
  5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.

+ the package met the Packaging Naming Guidelines.
+ the spec file name matches the base package %{name}.
+ the package met the Packaging Guidelines.
+ the license is OSS-compatible.
+ License tag matches the actual license.
_ no license file provided by upstream.
+ the spec file is written in American English.
+ the spec file is legible.
_ according to the comment in the spec file, the upstream link is dead.
+ the package is buildable on mock.
+ the package provides noarch only.
+ the package has the certain BuildRequires.
_ no locales files provided.
_ no shared libraries provided.
+ the package owns all directories in the package without duplicates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ files in the package has certain permissions.
+ the package consistently use macros.
+ the package contains permissable content.
_ no large documentation files provided.
+ %doc contains the release notes only.
_ no header files provided.
_ no static libraries provided.
_ no desktop files provided.
+ all filenames in rpm is valid UTF-8.

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]