[Bug 588194] Review Request: quickly - Command line tools to ease the creation of a new project

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=588194

--- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-14 16:16:17 EDT ---
review


+ OK
- NA
? ISSUE


+ Package meets naming and packaging guidelines
+ Spec file matches base package name.
+ Spec has consistant macro usage.
+ Meets Packaging Guidelines.
+ License
+ License field in spec matches
+ License file included in package
+ Spec in American English
+ Spec is legible.
+ Sources match upstream md5sum:

[Ankur@localhost SPECS]$ md5sum quickly_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz
../SOURCES/quickly_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz 
bcb01f8f70d6f082595a05aa089cc168  quickly_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz
bcb01f8f70d6f082595a05aa089cc168  ../SOURCES/quickly_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz


- Package needs ExcludeArch
+ BuildRequires correct

Please recheck this

+ Spec handles locales/find_lang
- Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
+ Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
+ Package has a correct %clean section.
+ Package has correct buildroot
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
+ Package is code or permissible content.
- Doc subpackage needed/used.
? Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.

- Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
- Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
- .pc files in -devel subpackage/requires pkgconfig
- .so files in -devel subpackage.
- -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
- .la files are removed.

- Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file

? Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
FAILS for rawhide?
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2188701

it looks like its to do with the version of distutils? please check this. 

+ Package has no duplicate files in %files.
+ Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
+ Package owns all the directories it creates.
+ No rpmlint output.

- final provides and requires are sane:
(include output of for i in *rpm; do echo $i; rpm -qp --provides $i; echo =;
rpm -qp --requires $i; echo; done
manually indented after checking each line.  I also remove the rpmlib junk and
anything provided by glibc.)

will check once build successfully.

SHOULD Items:

? Should build in mock.
failed koji

? Should build on all supported archs
? Should function as described.

not checked yet

- Should have sane scriptlets.
- Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend.
+ Should have dist tag
- Should package latest version
- check for outstanding bugs on package. (For core merge reviews)

Issues:

1.doc files should include the NEWS etc too , please add them
2. fails to build, please build in mock and recheck

Please look into the issues, ill continue the review once these are cleared. 

Ankur

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]