Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2006-10-30 08:04 EST ------- (In reply to comment #70) > Since the original submission, not just the soname has changed thrice. > From an initial libtcd.so.21{.0.3} to libtcd.so.0{.0.0}, and now once > more. And interestingly, due to an upstream change. Hear, hear! This > is the proof that an uncoordinated library versioning scheme like this > is much too fragile. Indeed this is something that should be discussed with upstream. > It would be irresponsible to approve these packages. The veto situation > is unclear. Hence the only way to block this from entering FE is to not > approve all this for now. I'm clearly waiting for your agreement before approving. On the positive side, I think that the package has been improved a lot during the review, with the dynamic library handling, the xttpd init file, the squashing of non free file, the dependency on wvs and other items. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review