[Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715





------- Additional Comments From braden@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-30 03:33 EST -------
(In reply to comment #2)
> Basically, the spec is in good shape for an initial submission. Nevertheless, it
> needs some work:
> 
> Let's start with what rpmlint has to say:
> 
> 1)
> W: openvrml-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog
> W: openvrml-devel no-version-in-last-changelog
> W: openvrml-gl no-version-in-last-changelog
> W: openvrml-gl-devel no-version-in-last-changelog
> W: openvrml-gtkplug no-version-in-last-changelog
> W: openvrml-mozilla-plugin no-version-in-last-changelog
> 
> Please add them.

Done, I think.

> 2)
> W: openvrml-devel no-version-dependency-on openvrml 0.16.1
> openvrml-devel lacks
> Requires: openvrml = %{version}-%{release}

Check.

> 3)
> W: openvrml-gl-devel summary-ended-with-dot OpenVRML OpenGL renderer headers and
> static library.
> W: openvrml-gtkplug summary-ended-with-dot VRML browser GtkPlug component for
> embedding in GTK+ applications.
> W: openvrml-mozilla-plugin summary-ended-with-dot VRML browser plug-in for
> Mozilla-based browsers.
> Please remove the '.' at the end of the corresponding Summary: lines.

Check.

> 4)
> E: openvrml-gl library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libopenvrml-gl.so.6.0.3
> E: openvrml-gl library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libopenvrml-gl.so.6.0.3
> Please add ldconfig calls, analogous to what you apply to the main package to
> openvrml-gl

Check.

> 5)
> E: openvrml-gtkplug info-files-without-install-info-postin
> /usr/share/info/openvrml-gtkplug.info.gz
> E: openvrml-gtkplug info-files-without-install-info-postun
> /usr/share/info/openvrml-gtkplug.info.gz
> You need to add appropriate calls to /usr/sbin/install-info to openvrml-gtkplug

Fixed, I think.

> 5)
> E: openvrml-gtkplug explicit-lib-dependency libXmu
> This requirement is redundant and should be removed (The dependency on libXmu is
> already being picked up by rpm).
> 
> In the same boat is this package's "Requires: gtk2". 
> It also probably is redundant.

Okay.

> 5) Any particular reason you explicitly "Requires: firefox" at several places?
> I thought mozilla-plugins being installed into .../mozilla/plugins were supposed
> to be usable by all mozilla-compatible browsers (mozilla, firefox, seamonkey,
> etc.), so an explicit "Requires: firefox" seems unnecessarily restrictive to me.

For openvrml, it's because libopenvrml links with libmozjs. Hopefully rpm picks
this up and this one isn't necessary.

For openvrml-mozilla-plugin, it's a holdover since the plug-in used to use
XPCOM. It doesn't anymore, so hopefully it's unnecessary, too.

> 6) Please "Requires: libGLU-devel" instead of "mesa-libGLU" in *-devel packages.

Okay. How come?

> 7) Please use "%{version}-%{release}"-style dependencies instead of "%{version}"
>  dependencies inside of your package.

Check.

spec: http://endoframe.com/openvrml.spec
srpm: http://endoframe.com/openvrml-0.16.1-2.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]