[Bug 591482] Review Request: forge-parent - Sonatype Forge Parent Pom

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591482

--- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-13 06:57:34 EDT ---
Review:

OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. OUTPUT:

forge-parent.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Sonatype -> Sonatina,
Sonata, Resonate
forge-parent.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Sonatype ->
Sonatina, Sonata, Resonate
Not a problem.

forge-parent.noarch: W: no-documentation
Nothing suitable as a doc.

forge-parent.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/forge-parent
Not a problem. 

OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. 
OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines .
OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. 
OK: The spec file must be written in American English.
OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. 
OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
OK: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. 
OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. 
OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. 
FIXIT: Each package must consistently use macros.
You have both %{_rm} and rm.

OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. 
OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. 
OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. 
OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. 
OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.


There should be a Requires: jpackage-utils because it installs files in a
directory owned by jpackage-utils

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]