Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591424 Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-12 05:23:32 EDT --- * source files match upstream: sha1sum statmod_1.4.6.tar.gz e488bfca55216c1fe3f8f5483fd4ec096d17027a statmod_1.4.6.tar.gz sha1sum rpmbuild/SOURCES/statmod_1.4.6.tar.gz e488bfca55216c1fe3f8f5483fd4ec096d17027a rpmbuild/SOURCES/statmod_1.4.6.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text is included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. - BuildRequires are proper. tex(latex) should be in the BR (needed for the man page) * %clean is present. * package builds in koji ( http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2182193 ). * package installs properly * test runs properly (?statmod::tweedie) * rpmlint produces 2 warnings, safe to ignore (spelling). 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. * final provides and requires are sane * %check is *not* present for circular dependency issue. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. I trust you can correct the BR before importing the package into the CVS. ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review