[Bug 212715] Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: openvrml - VRML/X3D runtime library


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212715





------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx  2006-10-29 22:46 EST -------
Basically, the spec is in good shape for an initial submission. Nevertheless, it
needs some work:

Let's start with what rpmlint has to say:

1)
W: openvrml-debuginfo no-version-in-last-changelog
W: openvrml-devel no-version-in-last-changelog
W: openvrml-gl no-version-in-last-changelog
W: openvrml-gl-devel no-version-in-last-changelog
W: openvrml-gtkplug no-version-in-last-changelog
W: openvrml-mozilla-plugin no-version-in-last-changelog

Please add them.


2)
W: openvrml-devel no-version-dependency-on openvrml 0.16.1
openvrml-devel lacks
Requires: openvrml = %{version}-%{release}


3)
W: openvrml-gl-devel summary-ended-with-dot OpenVRML OpenGL renderer headers and
static library.
W: openvrml-gtkplug summary-ended-with-dot VRML browser GtkPlug component for
embedding in GTK+ applications.
W: openvrml-mozilla-plugin summary-ended-with-dot VRML browser plug-in for
Mozilla-based browsers.
Please remove the '.' at the end of the corresponding Summary: lines.


4)
E: openvrml-gl library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib/libopenvrml-gl.so.6.0.3
E: openvrml-gl library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib/libopenvrml-gl.so.6.0.3
Please add ldconfig calls, analogous to what you apply to the main package to
openvrml-gl


5)
E: openvrml-gtkplug info-files-without-install-info-postin
/usr/share/info/openvrml-gtkplug.info.gz
E: openvrml-gtkplug info-files-without-install-info-postun
/usr/share/info/openvrml-gtkplug.info.gz
You need to add appropriate calls to /usr/sbin/install-info to openvrml-gtkplug


5)
E: openvrml-gtkplug explicit-lib-dependency libXmu
This requirement is redundant and should be removed (The dependency on libXmu is
already being picked up by rpm).

In the same boat is this package's "Requires: gtk2". 
It also probably is redundant.


5) Any particular reason you explicitly "Requires: firefox" at several places?
I thought mozilla-plugins being installed into .../mozilla/plugins were supposed
to be usable by all mozilla-compatible browsers (mozilla, firefox, seamonkey,
etc.), so an explicit "Requires: firefox" seems unnecessarily restrictive to me.


6) Please "Requires: libGLU-devel" instead of "mesa-libGLU" in *-devel packages.


7) Please use "%{version}-%{release}"-style dependencies instead of "%{version}"
 dependencies inside of your package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]