[Bug 450164] Review Request: ace-tao - The ADAPTIVE Communication Environment (ACE) and The ACE ORB (TAO)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450164

--- Comment #44 from Chen Lei <supercyper1@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-07 23:37:56 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> Recently I had contact with Progress/IONA for something else, but I raised the
> IDL CFE license issue again. The problem is that it is not easy for Progress to
> sort out the details, the people involved in the past have left the company and
> they don't have resources to sort this out at this moment.
> 
> Would it be an option to first just get MPC and ACE included?    

It'll be great to first get MPC and ACE included in fedora and TAO included in
rpmfusion-nonfree for a workaround, though spot thought some codes in ACE
wrapper are probably nonfree.

Could you help to contant Ken Sedgwick to reopen this review request and  tell
upstream to release seperate source tarballs for MPC, ACE, TAO and CIAO?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]