Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=575005 --- Comment #45 from Peng Wu <pwu@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-06 22:31:51 EDT --- Here are summary of this bug's current status here: This bug is discussing about how to deal with the binary model file, and about 3 solutions are posted here: 1. Consider zinnia-tomoe model data file arch-dependent, put the binary model in %{_libdir}, or %{_datadir} with the the arch name as the model file postfix. 2. Consider zinnia-tomoe model data file endian-dependent only, and provide both big-endian and little-endian model file. 3. Make a patch for zinnia, and make the model file completely arch-independent. (Thanks for Peng Huang's patch, sent to upstream.) Personally I prefer the solution 1 from Dennis Gilmore, and copy his comment here: >Reading though this it will be simpler for long term management for this to be >architecture specific. rpm doesn't understand endianness and trying to shoehorn >it in makes it much more complicated and difficult to work with. Please decide how to solve this problem, thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review