Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xtide - Calculate tide all over the world https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211626 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-27 20:08 EST ------- (In reply to comment #59) > (In reply to comment #58) > (one in documentation is quite funny). Exactly. "nobody" is really "nobody" at one point...... (In reply to comment #59) > What makes you think that? The xttpd.init formatting output is Well, I just wanted to release this as soon as possible, just ignore it. I appreciate any comment from you and Michael very much (and of course from other people). http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/xtide.spec http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/xtide-2.9-0.13.dev20061015.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- By the way, I have another question. I submitted a re-review request as this because it has passed "long" since xtide got dead, and actually it became to be clear that many changes are needed as we discussed on this bug. However in general is there any agreement when we should submit re-review requests for orphaned/dead packages? I cannot see any reference on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages . ( again I comment that for xtide I really think that re-review was needed ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review