Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: partimage https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=190000 czar@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Additional Comments From czar@xxxxxxx 2006-10-27 10:43 EST ------- OK, now that ntfs support has been added to extras, is it time to reconsider partimage? The addition of ntfs (ntfs-3g) to extras seems to have taken place in the October 2006 timeframe (late in the FC6 development cycle). There appears to have been some Red Hat internal discussion of NTFS to allow its addition to extras but I have been unable to find anything. What is the different between the ntfs-3g and ntfsprogs in extras and the ntfs support in partimage? If I understand correctly, the same rules apply to both Fedora Extras and Fedora Core ... e.g., no MP3 stuff. If ntfs any different? Is the ntfs support in partimage any different that that in ntfs-3g? Granted, ntfs-3g needs a lot more functionality since partimage only needs to handle ntfs partitions enough to backup and restore used blocks. I would be happy to see it added to extras but I really believe it needs to be added to Core so that it can be on the rescuecd ... I have built my own versions of the rescuecd which adds partimage and have found this to be very useful for backup and restore. If (somehow) the ntfs support in partimage is different from that in ntfs-3g, what changes in partimage would it take to make it as acceptable as ntfs-3g? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review