Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511107 --- Comment #13 from Mads Kiilerich <mads@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-05-01 09:38:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > rhythmbox-equalizer.x86_64: E: no-binary > > rhythmbox-equalizer.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > > This package would have been ideally noarch, but since it installs files in > arch dependant directories, there is no way to remove those warnings. Doesn't that mean that it is a bug in rhythmbox that it doesn't have an arch-independent plugin directory? (I would expect it do something similar to how x86_64 python uses both /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages and /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages.) Let's make Fedora ideal - and be pragmatic while we try ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review