Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=586473 Summary: Review Request: mg - Tiny Emacs-like editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ReportedBy: mmckinst@xxxxxxxxxxx QAContact: extras-qa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: notting@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora I am seeking a sponsor for this package. Spec URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/mg/mg.spec SRPM URL: http://mmckinst.nexcess.net/mg/mg-20090107-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: mg is a tiny, mostly public-domain Emacs-like editor included in the base OpenBSD system. It is compatible with Emacs because there shouldn't be any reason to learn more editor types than Emacs or vi. $ rpmlint mg.spec mg.spec:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint mg-20090107-1.fc12.src.rpm mg.src:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > ./mg.spec:25: W: configure-without-libdir-spec This is fine. The configure script does not accept any parameters and will fail if you give it any. I'm not sure if I got the licensing part correct. Source files are licensed under different licenses: BSD 3 clause, BSD 2 clause, MirOS, ISC, and public domain. I chose the most restrictive license (BSD with advertising) and used that as the primary license while mentioning the rest. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review