Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561451 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-26 15:08:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Does gcj support give no benefit in general, or is it simply not useful for > this package? Because if it gives no benefit in general, you Java folks may > wish to have the packaging committee update the guidelines to not say: > GCJ AOT bits SHOULD be built and included in packages. It gives no benefit in general. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review