Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array - C extension speeds perl-POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211714 cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From cweyl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2006-10-24 23:47 EST ------- There are redundant requires: lines in the spec. This causes one require to be duplicated, and in any case the dependency is correctly picked up by rpm's auto prov/deps scripts. The requires: lines should be dropped. The %files section has a line: %{perl_vendorarch}/POE/XS/Queue/Array.pm This should be changed to %{perl_vendorarch}/POE, otherwise the package will not own the directories under Array.pm correctly. Changing it to that will cause it to own POE/, POE/XS/, etc, etc... This one isn't a blocker, but I notice the presence of two benchmarking scripts in the package (bench[12].perl). I usually try to include things like this in %doc, as it may be useful to someone down the road. Note that if you do include these, you'll need to replace the #! line in bench2.perl so rpmlint doesn't complain, e.g. via something like: perl -pi -e 's|^#!perl|#!/usr/bin/perl|m' bench2.perl Drop the requires, modify the line in %files, and optionally add the benchmarking scripts and the package is approved. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license field matches the actual license. + license is open source-compatible. (GPL or Artistic) License text not included upstream. + source files match upstream: 06b39e893148b2b52ef408809104949e POE-XS-Queue-Array-0.003.tar.gz 06b39e893148b2b52ef408809104949e POE-XS-Queue-Array-0.003.tar.gz.srpm + latest version is being packaged. + BuildRequires are proper. package builds in mock ( ). + rpmlint is silent. O final provides and requires are sane: ** perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array-0.003-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Array.so()(64bit) perl(POE::XS::Queue::Array) = 0.003 perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array = 0.003-1.fc5 == requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.8.8) X perl(POE::Queue) X perl(POE::Queue) X perl(POE::Queue::Array) perl(strict) perl(vars) ** perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array-debuginfo-0.003-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm == rpmlint == provides Array.so.debug()(64bit) perl-POE-XS-Queue-Array-debuginfo = 0.003-1.fc5 == requires + no system shared libraries are present. + package is not relocatable. X owns the directories it creates. + doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + %clean is present. + %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2084, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.35 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.41 CPU) + no scriptlets present. + code, not content. + documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. + %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. + no headers. + no pkgconfig files. + no libtool .la droppings. + not a GUI app. + not a web app. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review