Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576431 --- Comment #20 from Michal Ambroz <rebus@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-20 09:53:04 EDT --- Hello Tomasi, I was following the recommendation from the licensing guidelines about using AND in the license field: "Fedora maintainers are highly encouraged to avoid this scenario whenever reasonably possible, by dividing files into subpackages (subpackages can each have their own License: field)." Statement seems pretty strong and in this case it was low effort to separate subpackage. Files are not linked together into one binary. Of course if you really do want to see this packaged under single package I will respect your opinion. >The split would make sense for example in case of library/tools with >different licenses split or in similar cases where the split out files can be >reasonably useful alone. I was rather thinking about possibility that someone can opt for installing different set of icons to use with skipfish. (not that such set would be available now) Best regards Michal Ambroz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review