Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583251 --- Comment #6 from Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-19 12:38:54 EDT --- Okay. So, the latter two licenses are just BSD. The top one would be a problem (Free but GPL-incompatible), but because it is from RSA and covers the "MD5 Message Digest Algorithm", it isn't. The full explanation is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#MD5 The short version: We can treat the code under that license as "Copyright Only", but we should advise the dcfldd upstream of the license incompatibility and recommend that they "use" this code without RSA's license as well, and reflect that usage in the source code by removing RSA's license (but not RSA's copyright). The license tag should be # Note that we are using the RSA MD5 code without license. # See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:FAQ#MD5 License: GPLv2+ and BSD and Copyright Only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review