Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581164 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-19 08:43:56 EDT --- Hmm, where are these guidelines? I don't remember any requirements to name the plugins in this strange way. Only reason for having a number of plugins with this odd name is because they are coming from the maven2 srpm. Please revert to the original name you used which matches the upstream name. "Package naming Packages MUST follow the standard Fedora Packaging/NamingGuidelines . Java API documentation MUST be placed into a sub-package called %{name}-javadoc. " -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review