Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #13 from Stjepan Gros <stjepan.gros@xxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-18 05:40:03 EDT --- Ok, the new package will be available tomorrow on the following links (currently, the server is down because some work is done on the power supply in the building): Spec URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client.spec SRPM URL: http://www.zemris.fer.hr/~sgros/stuff/fedora/openvas3/openvas-client-3.0.0-4.fc12.src.rpm I renamed desktop file, changed group, added htmldoc require. For symlinks, I looked in debian package and they also add symlinks. So, I created them. But I don't think there is a point in asking upstream to change the name of the binary. There is no point in changing it because some packager asks for it, there are plenty of other users that are probably used to it as it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review