Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562470 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-16 18:43:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > 1) inconsistency in naming between the openvas packages > Most tools in openvas suite are named openvas-something except the client > OpenVAS-Client . > The discrepancy is comming from the upstream package. > I would recommend to create symbolic link openvas-client just for comfort - big > letters are sexy, but could be hard to remember when all the other tools from > the suite are lowercase. > Agreed, a lower-case symlink would be handy. > 2) OpenVAS-Client is crushing with export to LaTeX of empty report > reported upstream > http://wald.intevation.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1343&group_id=29&atid=220 > This fixes it and could be included as a patch : http://wald.intevation.org/plugins/scmsvn/viewcvs.php/trunk/openvas-client/openvas/latex_output.c?root=openvas&rev=7137&r1=5830&r2=7137&makepatch=1&diff_format=h > 3) Export to pdf requires htmldoc > As report to pdf won't be probably the main exports used, > however there is question whether there should be rpm dependency > added to the spec file. > If it doesn't drag too much dependencies, it probably should. What happens if you try to use this feature and htmldoc is not available ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review