Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578024 --- Comment #7 from Jay Hankinson <jeremy.hankinson@xxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-15 14:20:01 EDT --- It does build on more architectures than i686. x86_64 & ia64 both build and are supported (ppc too, although it may require a little porting work). Just not from the current iteration of the packaging. My thinking was that I wanted to get i686 working in an acceptable manor first of all and then worry about the other platforms. The x86_64 build, has 32bit runtime components to it which present another level of complexity for packaging. As this is my first attempt at packaging a product from source, I was expecting it to be very much an iterative process. I'm more than prepared to do the work necessary to get it included with Fedora. As well as aspiring to be the packager for Ingres on Fedora, I'm also an upstream contributor. I've worked for the company for many years and one of my roles is the Linux build and packaging monkey. Whilst my primary goal is to get Ingres included in Fedora, I would also like to become more generally involved with the Fedora project. Ingres is a mature, sophisticated and widely used product with substantial engineering resources behind it and I think its inclusion would benefit both the Ingres and Fedora communities. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review