[Bug 582369] Review Request: perl-anyevent-i3 - Communicate with the i3 window manager

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582369

Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+

--- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert <cwickert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-14 16:28:17 EDT ---
Please use the template from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&format=extras-review
when you file a new review request. Post the link to the spec and not only the
srpm. Thanks!


REVIEW FOR 
61fd1d09f25e23ce0f28a97b37a6140a  perl-anyevent-i3-0.04-1.fc14.src.rpm

OK - MUST: $ rpmlint
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/perl-anyevent-i3-0.04-1.fc14.*
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
FIX - MUST: not named according to the Package Naming Guidelines: Package name
should be case sensitive
OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name}
OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines
OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines
FIX - MUST: License field in spec file does not match the actual license:
Should be "GPL+ or Artistic"
N/A - MUST: license file included in %doc
OK - MUST: spec is in American English
OK - MUST: spec is legible
OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5
50ab7d0b40c2c244ebd936e6cf45ab54
OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64
N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch.
OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires.
N/A - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang
N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths,
must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries.
N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package.
OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates
OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing
OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...)
OK - MUST: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}.
OK - MUST: consistently uses macros
OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content
N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage
N/A - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application
N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package
N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package
N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires:
pkgconfig'.
N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix, then library
files that end in .so must go in a -devel package.
N/A - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully
versioned dependency
OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives.
N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file
FIX - MUST: package owns files or directories already owned by other packages:
/usr/share/perl5/AnyEvent/
OK - MUST: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}.
OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8


SHOULD Items:
N/A - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file.
N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file
should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
OK - SHOULD: builds in mock.
OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
OK - SHOULD: functions as described.
N/A - SHOULD: Scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.
N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency.
N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg
OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or
/usr/sbin


Other items:
OK - latest stable version
OK - SourceURL valid


Issues:
- The package name shoud be perl-AnyEvent-I3 (case sensitive) because this is
the name of the perl module it provides
- License tag should be "GPL+ or Artistic", see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#License_tag
- package owns /usr/share/perl5/AnyEvent but this is already owned by
perl-AnyEvent. perlAnyEvent is a dependency of this package, so it must not own
this dir. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Directory_Ownership
- Add CHANGES to %doc
- Changelog entry "New upstream release" is misleading becaue this is the first
package and the first release.


Please fix these issues before building and consider the package APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list
package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]