Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=581334 --- Comment #3 from Eric Smith <eric@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 2010-04-12 19:44:46 EDT --- Thank you for looking at it! The PPC64 fail was because of a patch I'd added to make earlier upstream releases build on PPC64. The patch is no longer needed, so I've now removed it. The .msg files *are* arch-independent. I did a scratch build for F-12 and verified that they came out the same on all four arches. However, the files do contain a timestamp, and that could cause two different builds to have different (but fully compatible) .msg files. Because they are arch-independent, I am not moving them to %_libdir. The updated spec and SRPM are: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/asl/asl.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/asl/asl-1.42-0.2.bld75.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review