Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537983 dr.trigon@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #15 from dr.trigon@xxxxxxxxx 2010-04-12 15:47:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) Sorry for the delay, I was stunned by your post :) and so it took me a while to digest... ;) > It will be better to test with the new version. I try to get the packages for > F-12, so you don't need to build them on your own. What is the state here - I want to badger you, just curious... > Thanks for the logs. > I am German - so no problem at all ;) Good to now, just in case... ;) > (If you run anything with 'LC_ALL=C $and_the_command' prefixed, it will be in > English - just a side note.) Thanks for the hint! Was useful, as you will see next. > Another possibility would be: > Just download the spec file and run 'spectool -g python-visual.spec'. That will > download the sourcefile from upstream and you can simply run 'rpmbuild -ba > python-visual.spec' and will have the RPM in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS. > I found out, what's the reason for not building on F-12 (at least on my > machine): > bug 185079 comment 4 > mock is complaining: > ../include/python/num_util.hpp:73:31: warning: numpy/arrayobject.h: No such > file or directory I tried this, for me good to see was; no tom issue, but an error while trying to generate the rpm, output is attached (I think we had this error already). > Could you try to install the F-13 version? Usually there won't be a problem > with it. When this package is reviewed, I'll ping the maintainer of numpy, to > ship an update for F-12, so this can be build on F-12 too. I tried but was not able to install the F-13 version, package dependencies, a lot... (shall I go the hard way and install them all one by one manually?!? please say no...) The numpy update would be cool, when will it be available? > There is a new version from upstream. But, because on ubuntu there is > python-visual and you later do a 'import visual' I choosed now to rename the > package to python-visual. (see: > http://vpython.org/contents/download_linux.html) > This later also matches to python3-visual, once there will be python3 support. > I did a 'Obsoletes: vpython' for now because of this... Yes, I recognized this already and think this a good idea! More consistent (logic) and user friendly. And why give it a new name, when there is already one... Whan does the 'obsolete' do? > Could you please try to do as root: > 'rpm -U > http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/rpms/python-visual-5.32-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm > http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/rpms/python-visual-debuginfo-5.32-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm' I don't think this will work, since I'm running an i386 system... What to do? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review